People that are planting their fields are those that can fence their plots to prevent these distracting visits by the dear cows, goats, horses and sometimes pigs. In a certain village in Ematolweni, Tabankulu, 52 families have come together to develop an agricultural cooperative, they have been supported by funders and now have their land fenced and are growing food for consuption and for trade.
Some people have opted to move away from their family allocated fields because they are situated next to livestock grazing land, to plant on land much further from their homes.
Picture taken at Dudumeni, Mbizana by Nokhanyo Mhlana
There is also the growing number of government initiatives(e.g.Lima, Asgisa, AgriSA) intended at growing food on, they all grow food on communities family's fields (emasimini abantu), the issues and risks are that:
1. The seeds used are mostly GMO seeds, so the land will be damaged when returned to the communities
2. Family's get a maximum of 5 sacks of maize or beans from the produce of their own land, not enough to sustain the families throughout the year until the next harvest.
3. Giving people 5 sacks of produce is not a solution
This is not what most communities want to see happenings, the new trend and possibility for the future is fencing the field plots and continuing to farm, as well as coming up with other solutions to this farming strife,looking at possibilities of growing crops that are foreign and not edible to the livestock.
Food and survival are to be worked for!!!
Interesting Article, i have been highly involved in promoting some of these rural sustainability projects of which i have made many observations as well. I agree giving 5 bsacks of maize to each household is not enough, establishing cooperatives that the rural people have no control over due to lack of skill in an attempt to promote sustainability is also not the soulution. Villagers need to be in control of their own development, and government must shy away from using their land to fulfill profit making missions.Its amazing to see that through the ASGISA model 90% of the harvest is taken away and the community gets 10%. Reason being that they will come back the following year to assist with farming. However i argue that the community has no control over how much profit is made out of the 90%. It would be better if Assets were bought for the communites such as machinery and equipment to reduce dependancy, and start promoting ownership.By Kwantu Luluntu
ReplyDelete